Source for BlockChain News

Monthly archive

March 2013

Bitcoin Halving is Coming Soon

by
Bitcoin halving

Bitcoin halving

The crypto sphere has seen a lot of buzz over the past few months with regards to the Bitcoin halving that is going to take place in May. Bitcoin is the biggest cryptocurrency in the world, and it is only natural that the upcoming halving event has caused such a stir in the crypto sphere at large.

Key Things to Watch

However, there is something else that needs to be considered at this point. The markets across the world have been sent into a tailspin due to the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, and it is worthwhile to consider whether this is going to affect the halving event.

A halving event literally cuts the rewards earned by miners when mining a coin by 50%, and over the years, such an event has proven to be a good thing for Bitcoin. In the past, Bitcoin’s price saw a spike following such a measure because halving often led to a rush of new investors into the cryptocurrency. However, this time, the situation could be different.

The coronavirus pandemic has unleashed economic miseries, with hundreds of thousands of people losing their jobs and having to take checks from the government. The turmoil could have an effect on the number of people who are actually willing to spend any money on buying cryptocurrencies after the Bitcoin halving.

>> Ripple’s Xpring Introduces Smart Features to XRP Ledger

Financial markets all over the world have been rocked by widespread sell-offs, and the United States Federal Reserve has had to announce a stimulus package worth trillions of dollars to try and stabilize the stock markets. As a matter of fact, there are widespread fears that the world is going to change forever due to the effect of this particular pandemic, and there is a feeling that cryptocurrencies might not even exist in the coming years. So it definitely seems likely that the current situation is going to have an effect on the Bitcoin halving event.

What do you think?

Featured image: DepositPhotos © aa-w

Please See Disclaimer

If You Liked This Article Click To Share


Risks and Disclosure:

Information provided in this correspondence is intended solely for informational purposes and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable. While all information is believed to be reliable, it is not guaranteed by us to be accurate. Individuals should assume that all information contained on this website is not trustworthy unless verified by their own independent research. Also, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, there will likely be differences between any predictions made or suggested and the actual results.

All statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Cryptocurrencynews.com or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of all statements. Cryptocurrencynews.com was not involved in any aspect of the article preparation. The author was not paid by Market Jar Media Inc for this article. The author did not pay Cryptocurrencynews.com to publish or syndicate this article.

This article does not constitute as investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial advisor; any and all actions taken by a reader as a result of the information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Cryptocurrencynews.com’s terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is in no way a solicitation for investment. Cryptocurrencynews.com does not render general or specific investment advice. Any information on Cryptocurrencynews.com should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Cryptocurrencynews.com does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Cryptocurrencynews.com.

Futures, stocks and options trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The valuation of futures, stocks, and options may fluctuate, and, as a result, clients may lose more than their original investment and possibly their entire investment. Any content on this website should not be relied upon as advice or construed as providing recommendations of any kind. It is your responsibility to confirm and decide which trades to make. Always consult a licensed investment professional before making any investment decision. Be extremely careful, investing in securities carries a high degree of risk; you may likely lose some or all of the investment.

Please see our full disclaimer here for additional details before making any investment decisions.

Cryptocurrency Not Banned in India, According to RBI

by
cryptocurrency

cryptocurrency

Over the course of the past half-decade or so, the cryptocurrency space has grown at a breakneck pace, and it is believed that it is going to keep expanding in the years to come. However, in this regard, it is also important to note that it has thrived because many nations have not outlawed crypto tokens.

In this regard, India, one of the world’s biggest economies, cleared the air about its stance on cryptocurrencies. The central bank of the country, the Reserve Bank of India, stated that despite reports to the contrary, cryptocurrencies are not banned in the country.

Key Details

The RBI stated that it has not technically banned cryptocurrencies but instead created ring-fence regulations by way of which the country’s banks and other financial entities are protected from risks related to these assets. The Indian central bank has also asked the banks in the country not to deal with cryptocurrencies. On top of that, cryptocurrency exchanges in India have also been starved of regular banking support, and that has seen the closure of some exchanges in recent times.

The latest announcement from the RBI will, however, come as a boost for the sector. After all, the central bank has clearly stated that cryptocurrencies are not banned in India.

In a statement, the RBI said, “The RBI has been able to ring-fence the entities regulated by it from being involved in activities that pose reputational and financial risks along with other legal and operational risks.” The development, however, is also an indication that the situation is probably going to continue to be tough for cryptocurrency exchanges that are looking for access to banks.

>> Libra Still Faces Uphill Battle Despite Softened Swiss Stance

More importantly, crypto traders are also barred from using their bank accounts to fund their accounts with fiat currency or withdraw fiat. However, the fact that cryptocurrencies are not actually banned in India should come as a glimmer of hope.

Featured image: DepositPhotos © artjazz

If You Liked This Article Click To Share

Telegram Token Sales Canceled By Liquid Exchange

by
Telegram

Telegram

Japan-based Liquid Exchange has canceled the sale of Telegram’s Gram tokens and returned funds to customers as the messaging app company remains embroiled in an SEC lawsuit.

The exchange has said that it is acting in compliance with the investor agreement, which states that Telegram’s Open Network (TON) should have been launched by October 31, 2019; otherwise it must initiate the process of returning funds to investors. As a result of the longstanding lawsuit brought against the messaging app by the SEC, an injunction has been brought out to prevent the launch of TON indefinitely.

In a blog post posted earlier today, Liquid said, “The Gram Token Sale on Liquid has been canceled, and all funds that were held in escrow by Liquid have now been returned to Liquid users who participated in the Gram Token Sale. Every Liquid user that submitted a purchase order for Gram tokens via Liquid will receive an email in the coming days with further details.”

Despite being one of the largest early investors, Liquid’s Gram sale is totally unaffiliated to Telegram due to the terms of sale in the original ICO, which state that the reselling of Gram tokens within the first 18 months from the launch of TON is prohibited and could lead to the cancelation of the tokens. Despite this, a secondary market for Gram tokens quickly sprung up, with some investors seeing gains in excess of 400%.

>> Ethereum (ETH) Soars 35% in a Month: What to Expect Now?

Telegram has been fighting a lawsuit with the SEC after the commission alleged that Gram tokens are, in fact, a security, and therefore the US$1.7 billion raised by way of an ICO in early 2018 should have been registered with the commission. Telegram has unequivocally denied all allegations leveled at it; however, it was hit with new evidence this week, which appeared to show that at least two entities invoiced Telegram for a commission from selling Gram tokens in June and July of 2018, several months after its ICO ended.

Telegram is set to return to court with the SEC on February 18 and 19, when more clarity should be provided on the future of TON and Gram tokens.

Featured image: DepositPhotos © prykhodov

If You Liked This Article Click To Share

Blockchain and Social Media | A Match Made in Heaven?

by
social media

social media

Social media platforms of the new future will be very different from what we have today, that is if the current trends are to sustain. Social networking is not an old phenomenon. It has picked up in the last two decades. At the dawn of the internet, as it started to gain mainstream adoption in the early 90s, the only thing we could do was view information and send messages via email. Later on, as the decade progressed, online search started to become a big thing, and later microblogging caught on, albeit at a small scale.

Instead of just viewing information, the idea of sharing and forming platforms started to grow. America Online (AOL) could be viewed as heralding this era when it enabled the creation of member profiles that were searchable. Nonetheless, major strides in social networking were not made until after the dot com bubble burst in 2000. The new era of social networking sites began. Friendster was launched in 2002, then Myspace in 2003, LinkedIn also in 2003, and Facebook in 2004. Even Google launched Orkut, a social networking site, in 2004. It has since shut it down.

Facebook and Myspace became the two leading social networking sites until Facebook dominated. Facebook specifically did a few things differently from Myspace that worked—starting by targeting university students, understanding its core product value, etc.—and these things eventually allowed it to increase engagement and capitalize on ads.

Later came Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and Snapchat—all with one core idea—giving a platform for people to share their daily life experiences. User-generated content became the main thing. To monetize the platforms, the only viable model was through allowing companies to place ads while people used the service for free. As people generated more content, engagement grew. As time went by, more customer data was being analyzed and tracked in order to give better ad placement than TV and other traditional platforms could offer.

This has been the dominant model for social media platforms, but major problems have arisen from this model.

Hacking and data leaks have been a huge problem, perhaps the most concerning. Facebook allows third-party developers to create applications that work on Facebook’s platform. Recently, we learned about how this has been abused, exposing users’ records, names, passwords, comments, etc. It started with the Cambridge Analytica scandal. LinkedIn also had a password breach.

Too many ads can lead to a bad customer experience. Many social media companies, in a bid to increase revenue, found more ways to customize ads. The length of time a person stays on a platform became the main metric, and all efforts have been done to increase staying time. The centralized control of social media companies means that they optimize for engagement and ease of use in order to make better targeting for advertisers. Sometimes this comes at the expense of users.

Even with increased staying time, the majority of the value generated accrues to the platforms themselves and not the users who are the creators of the content.

Fake accounts, spamming, and bots are also becoming a menace for current social media platforms. For example, Facebook recently said that in the first quarter of 2019, it had removed 2.2 billion fake accounts. That is a high figure, even though Facebook says it is able to flag fake accounts within minutes of registering. In addition, how to manage privacy in an ad-based model is still a challenge.

Finally, there’s online harassment and hate speech. This has always been a problem but has especially become so in the last few years. The only way a user can really deal with this is by reporting the account; beyond that, the jury is still out on how best to solve the issue of online harassment and hate speech.

>> Tether (USDT) Accidentally Creates $5 Billion in Crypto

It Started with Bitcoin

The launch of bitcoin in 2009 sought to change the way we view and use money. Satoshi outlined the vision of a decentralized, censorship-resistance internet-based money. Bitcoin has acted as a currency and medium of exchange, enabling borderless mechanisms to store and exchange value. The idea is to reduce centralized control and the single point of failure, which can be prone to manipulation and locks out many, especially those in countries with failing monetary regimes and a lack of ways to transfer value cheaply across national borders. This aspect of decentralized networks has caught on and is now being extended beyond money to other areas.

Ethereum later came in 2015, introducing the idea of a platform to build and launch decentralized applications. Hundreds of use cases have evolved from here: fundraising (ICOs), prediction markets, data storage, etc.

Social media is one of the use cases. As outlined above, some of the major challenges of existing social networks can be solved by decentralized networks if they work as envisioned.

  1. Reduce powerful corporations controlling huge chunks of data;
  2. Deal with problems of bots and fake accounts;
  3. Incentivize good behavior through tokens—this could reduce spamming/trolling;
  4. Enable contributors to earn based on the content they share;
  5. A payment system.

Let’s look at some of the existing projects trying to solve the problems currently plaguing social media.

Steemit

Steemit was an early blockchain startup that showcased how the technology could be used to benefit content creators. As a decentralized alternative to platforms like Reddit, users are able to create accounts and start posting content. When it becomes popular, they earn Steem tokens.

This way, spam content is eliminated. Users can exchange tokens with other cryptocurrencies or fiat on exchanges. Started in 2016, it has now amassed 1 million users. However, it has not yet achieved scale to rival any of the existing social media platforms.

Voice

Block.one, the company behind the EOS cryptocurrency, announced on the first anniversary of EOS mainnet on June 1, 2019, that it was launching a social media platform called Voice.

The information available from the launch says that the platform will seek to eliminate bots through a special authentication process when onboarding users. If successful, that would eliminate one of the main challenges of managing fake accounts and bots on traditional social media.

The Voice token will be at the center of the network whereby users receive Voice tokens based on the content they share and by collecting likes. The token cannot be obtained in any other way, such as mining, but only through the platform, and it can be spent promoting users’ own posts.

Facebook’s Libra

Even the existing social media platforms such as Facebook are realizing that this is not a passing façade.

Facebook first came out in support of blockchain in 2018 when its CEO said that they were looking into blockchain as possible solutions for their privacy woes. Later in December 2018, it has heavily been reported by various new platforms such as Bloomberg that, finally, Facebook is launching its own cryptocurrency, Libra. The announcement came on June 18, 2019. and Libra is expected in 2020.

Libra is to be in the form of a stablecoin for facilitating payments on Facebook’s platforms. According to the whitepaper, the project is a collaboration of 27 other partners which form the Libra Association; each partner contributes $10 towards the project and hosts a node. Facebook formed Calibra, which is to be Facebook’s own representative in the Libra Association. David Marcus, head of Calibra, says that members are expected to grow to 100 by the time the launch.

Libra is meant to facilitate payments across the world. Facebook would benefit by enabling its 2.2 billion users to have a way to make payments easily and cheaply. Further down the line, Libra could be used to enable users to pay for ads on the platform.

Nonetheless, Facebook has received a lot of backlash from lawmakers in both Washington and Europe. Reports also indicate that China could launch its own version to compete with Libra.

This is not the first time Facebook has experimented with digital tokens, having launched Facebook credits in 2009 to enable users to purchase items such as games on the site before terminating the project after it failed to gather traction. However, with the rise of cryptocurrency tokens, could this social media platform have now found a way?

>> John McAfee Reiterates His $1 Million by 2020 BTC Price Prediction

Telegram

Telegram, the messaging platform, is also building the TON, or Telegram Open Network, which will enable users to undertake e-commerce.

Telegram raised $1.7 billion in 2018, making it one of the biggest ICOs ever. In February this year, The Block reported that the project was 90% complete and would be launched in Q3 of 2019.

Telegram aims to launch GRAM, the native token powering the TON. To add to messaging, the TON is expected to enable payments via GRAM, a decentralized marketplace, and peer-to-peer file hosting as explained in its technical whitepaper. The project is speculated to be in testing mode currently, and more details will be availed when the project is fully launched later this year.

With 200 million monthly users already, the launch of TON could radically change messaging as Telegram is already one of the most widely used non-blockchain based messaging platforms, particularly for ICOs, mainly because of its privacy features. If TON is successful, this could solve the monetization challenge of the platform, since the founder Pavel Durov has publicly said that Telegram will never allow ads as a method of monetization.

From Now On

For the majority of the new and upcoming blockchain-based social media platforms, incentivizing good behavior, payment channels, and rewarding users for sharing content seems to be the core tenets of blockchain-influenced social media.

Until now, the only viable way to make money by being on social media as a user has been growing a following or fan base to high numbers, having some level of influence, and then endorsing or sponsoring products through which the user can earn a commission based on set metrics.

However, for the majority of the remaining users, there is no incentive not to troll, spam, and so forth. With tokens, the idea is to reward those who spend more on the platform, sharing updates, pictures, stories, and the like. Social media giants such as Facebook have come under pressure for generating billions of dollars in ad revenue based on content created by users while users do not benefit directly. Native platform tokens could unlock this problem. The extent to which this will work remains to be seen, but at the core, it challenges the fundamentals of how not only social media but also by extension, the internet has been built so far.

Privacy, payments, and control over data seem to be at the core of how the future of social media is going to work.

Time will tell.

Featured image: DepositPhotos © yourg

If You Liked This Article Click To Share

Go to Top